Friday, 23 November 2012

11/20/2012 

Early Times Report

JAMMU, Nov 20 : Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the Jammu State Morcha (JSM) leaders have criticized Kashmiri separatists for trying to give a communal and political colour to the traditional annual Amarnath pilgrimage by "unnecessarily" raking up "extraneous" issues, including environmental degradation and pollution.
Referring to the campaign having been launched by chairman Hurriyat Conference (G), Syed Ali Shah Geelani, against "unimaginary" plan of the Shrine Board to construct a tarred road from Pahalgam to the holy cave and against the plan of constructing a township at Baltal the VHP and he JSM leaders have stated that when there was neither the plan to construct a metalled road and a township the separatists were simply whipping up communal passions and unrest.
The Chief of VHP, Dr Ramakant Dubey, and a senior JSM leader, Ashwini Kumar, have stated that there was no justification for the separatists to campaign against the constitution of the Amarnath Shrine Board. They said that the Board had been constituted after the Shrine Board, set up for Mata Vaishno Devi,had achieved major success in developing the environs around the shrine and the facilities for the pilgrims. They said that Geelani was favouring Kashmiri Pandits to run the affairs of the yatra which was not possible when over 95 percent of the Pandit population had migrated to the plains since the rise of militancy related violence. The V HP and the JSM leaders also expressed their dismay over the allegations that growing rush of pilgrims to the holy cave of Amarnath would pollute the entire environment adding that when during the last over 150 years the environs of the cave shrine and the mountain routes from Pahalgam to the cave and from Baltal to the shrine had not got polluted why should it then lead to environmental degradation now. These leaders wanted to inform the separatists that whatever waste material was being thrown on the mountain routes would get consumed under deep snow and ice that would keep the entire area out of bounds for over five months.
They said that the Government and the separatists need to encourage bigger pilgrim traffic to Amarnath cave as it would help porters, ponywallas and hoteliers, besides traders and transporters to earn a fortune. They said that the pilgrim traffic to the shrines of Vaishno Devi and Amarnath cave have become a permanent affair.They said that over 70 lakh pilgrims to Vaishno Devi and over five lakh pilgrims to Amarnath cave have the potential for becoming a backbone of the state's economy.




11/20/2012 10:16:43 PM

EARLY TIMES REPORT

JAMMU, Nov 20: Former Union Minister Prof. Chaman Lal Gupta MLA has ridiculed the conduct of the elections of the Legislative Council seats of Panchayat quota without completing the process of elections as per the Panchayat Raj Act even that of Jammu and Kashmir, and indicated to make it an issue of challenging this whole drama in court of law as also on other forces of public debate.
Taking a strong exception to the statements of the Pradesh Congress President, Prof. Saif-ud-Din Soz and some other leaders of the State Coalition that the Block and District Committees polls linked with Panchayati Raj would be held shortly and the Panchayats would be empowered, Prof. Gupta observed that it was strange that Council polls are being held before completion of elections to the Panchayati Raj system as per law.
Premises of empowering Panchayats and that of providing of honorarium sounds luring the electors and it is a matter that the election commission should take cognizance.
The question is that why it was not done before going for polls and why these basic democracies were not empowered prior to the start of this battle of hustings even for four seats which are part of the Legislature.
He said that 73rd and 74th Amendments of the Indian Constitution are basis for empowering the basic democracies viz the Panchayats and Local bodies. The Congress in their Election Manifestoes had committed to this major issue but it was strange that they are not only sailing with the National Conference which is not favouring extension of anymore provision of the Indian Constitution to this part of the country but for their semi-separatist mindset.
Gupta said that instead of sorting out these basic issues of democratic rights of the people as also that of the unity of the country before forming the Coalition, both these parties opted for sharing the benefits of power without forging even a Common Minimum Programme and now their marriage of convenience of 2009, is recoiling upon the interests of the country as also that of democracy at the grass root level.


NEWS PUBLISHED IN EXCELLSIOR
Major controversy engulfs appointment list
Candidate 'approved' for District Judge post
has links with Pak based militant outfit

* Another name withdrawn for 'excess' marking
Neeraj Rohmetra
Jammu, Nov 20: Shocking though it may sound that State Government has put on hold appointment of one of the candidates for the post of District and Session Judge after the dossier sent by Criminal Investigation Department (CID) to the Law Department 'verified' that the candidate had close links with PTM (Pak-Trained Militant).
In another case, the candidate had 'inadvertently' been awarded excess marks in the Higher Judiciary (Direct Recruitment) examination due to which he had been declared 'selected'. "However, as the papers were subjected to re-checking, it was found that the candidate didn't have the desired marks", reliable sources said.
They said, "the appointment of nine District and Session Judges had been engulfed into a major controversy with the State Government deciding to withhold names of these two candidates. Besides, the appointment had been challenged in various courts of the State and even in the Apex Court".
Sources said that the appointment order of the candidate with militant-links had raised several eyebrows in the Judiciary and among Government circles. "The irony of the facts can be gauged from the fact that the candidate occupied the top slot in the appointment order issued by the Government", sources added.
Sources in the Home Department also categorically stated that all the dossiers of the candidates had been sent to the Law Department. "The dossier of the candidate with militant links categorically stated that he has himself remained an active member of the Pakistan backed militant outfit and has been closely associated with several anti-national elements. The dossier also mentioned the name of the militant outfit with which the candidate has been actively associated", sources asserted.
Elaborating on the method adopted for verification process, sources said, "the procedure is same as the one adopted in case of other service appointment. The confidential details from High Court are forwarded to the CID, which are then forwarded to district level officials for further verification in consultation with Special Branch (SB). The consolidated reports are then sent back to the concerned quarters".
In the case of second aspirant, sources stated that the candidate while appearing for the entrance examination had attempted two choice questions, while as only either of them had to be answered. "Further, the individual while doing marking had inadvertently given marks for both the answers, while only one of them was relevant. With the results the score of the candidate which was earlier declared as 92 had dropped down to 85 after necessary verification", sources said.
"Now that the cases of both of these candidates had come to the fore, the State Government had no choice but to drop their names", sources asserted.
Besides, several petitions had been filed in different courts including the Apex Court while challenging the selection list of nine District and Session Judges.
Some of the candidates, who couldn't make it to the selection process had also filed a petition before the Supreme Court on the subject. The Court had given the direction that the appointments to the Higher Judicial Service, if made will be subject to the outcome of the petition.
Also, at least 17 Sub-Judges have challenged the list before High Court in Jammu while pleading that the direct recruitment may hamper their career prospects.
In a writ petition filed before the High Court the Sub-Judges claimed that their service career and prospects are likely to be pre-judicially affected in case 13 posts of District and Sessions Judges are filled-up by the direct recruitment "at the cost of right of the in-service officers for promotion earned by the length of their service under the State Judiciary."
Around 215 candidates had appeared in Higher Judiciary (Direct Recruitment) Examination conducted by the State High Court. Though 13 posts were desired to be filled up and 15 candidates were short listed for interview, only nine candidates were declared successful.
Names of nine advocates were selected for District Judges, included five from Kashmir and four from Jammu region in the month of August this year. The list of nine candidates including Muhammad Altaf Khan, Haq Nawaz Zargar, Tahir Khurshid Raina, Shazia Tabsum, Tasleem Arief, Sonia Gupta, Rajinder Sapru, Naseer Ahmed Dar and Pawan Kumar Kundal.

No comments:

Post a Comment