Regressive forces support, oppose the
Maharaja simultaneously
WP refugee issue: Bloody agitation
threatened --I
Rustam
JAMMU, Jan 13:
Regressive forces in Kashmir are opposing and supporting Maharaja Hari Singh
simultaneously. They are supporting him because he in 1927 introduced State
Subject Definition with a view to preventing the outsiders from settling in
Jammu & Kashmir and acquiring jobs under the state government. Maharaja
Hari Singh had taken this step in the wake of the Kashmiri leadership's demand
asking the state government to "import educated persons from Punjab and
other parts of British India to man all important official positions in the state
on the ground that the state already had sufficient educated persons. It was
the Dogra Sadar Sabha of the time which had persuaded Maharaja Hari Singh to
enact such a piece of legislation to defeat the move of the regressive and
communal forces in the Kashmir Valley. The Kashmiri leadership had opposed
tooth and nail the State Subject Definition and described it as a conspiracy
against the people of Kashmir (barring the minorities like the Kashmiri
Hindus).
The attitude of
regressive forces in the Valley changed the day the Maharaja acceded Jammu
& Kashmir to India. In fact, ever since 1947, the regressive forces in
Kashmir, including all Kashmir-based parties and the so-called civil society
groups plus commentators and reporters, have been opposing those demanding
repeal of the State Subject Definition saying that such a move would be
construed by them as a conspiracy against the followers of a particular
religious group or members of a particular religious sect and that they will
fight against the move with their blood. Even yesterday, they threatened a
bloody agitation in case the state government goes in for an amendment in the
Jammu & Kashmir Constitution to grant citizenship rights to the refugees
from West Pakistan, mostly Dalits.
Taking
a strong exception to the otherwise non-existent bill (on the refugee rights),
a so-called Kashmir-based civil society group, Kashmir Centre for Social and
Developmental Studies (KSCDS), yesterday described the non-existent bill as a
"conspiratorial move and a direct attack on the unique ethnic character of
the state (read the Valley proper)" and said, "Any erosion of this
Article (State Subject Definition sanctioned by the State Constitution and
protected by Article 370 of the Indian Constitution) will have disastrous
consequences and will be fought against with blood by Kashmiris (read followers
of a particular religion) as this is their only protection against being
swamped by outsiders. "Besides being illegal and unconstitutional, it is
an assault on our (read regressive forces in Kashmir) identity. All political
parties in the state should come clear about this grave and sensitive issue
without equivocating and politicizing…They must foil this evil attempt tooth
and nail keeping in view the larger ramifications of the issue. Congress
leaders are warned hereby to desist from carrying out a colonial project to
please their masters in Delhi," the KSCDS also said. It, in addition,
praised Maharaja Hari Singh and Kashmiri Hindus of the time who had, according
to it, made the Maharaja adopt and implement the State Subject Definition.
The
KSCDS through its outrageous statement sought to create an impression that the
state government at the behest of certain Congress leaders and ministers like
Raman Bhalla and Sham Lal Sharma will table a bill in the upcoming session of
Jammu & Kashmir legislature and grant "State Subject rights to the
West Pakistan refugees". This is a false and politically motivated
propaganda. It's true that Revenue Minister Raman Bhalla had last week said
that the government will amend the state constitution to grant domicile
certificates to these struggling and suffering refugees, but he had gone back
on his assurance when many Kashmiri leaders, both "mainstream" and
separatist, opposed his solemn commitment. Going back on his promise, the under-attack
Revenue Minister had said the West Pakistan refugees will get domicile
certificates only after a consensus was evolved on the issue, something that
will never happen considering the rabid opposition of the highly communal NC
leadership to the otherwise very reasonable, secular and democratic demand. By
opposing the refugee issue, the KSCDS, like others in Kashmir, only
demonstrated its hatred for all, barring those belonging to the sect to which
its members belong. (To be concluded).
Source: http://earlytimesnews.com/newsdet.aspx?q=103745
No comments:
Post a Comment